AI Execution Sprint — SV Execution Partners
AI Execution Sprint

70% of Nordic firms commit
10%+ of their IT budget to AI.
Only 4% see meaningful ROI.

"In a post-AI world, strategy execution is the only competitive advantage left."

What separates the two groups comes down to whether the leadership team has an execution system that translates AI investment into weekly outcomes the board can measure.

In two weeks we put that system in motion. Our role is the execution layer around AI, the OKR architecture and governance that gets adoption across your leadership team connected to measurable business outcomes, with a working rhythm your team continues to refine.

Only 6 seats available for May 2026
The context

Strategy execution is the only advantage left.

Most mid-market and enterprise strategies fail at execution. The strategy itself is rarely the issue. The operating model to run it at the pace the business now requires was never built. In a post-AI world, where priorities shift faster than organisations can adapt, that problem becomes existential.

AI is forcing every leadership team to reorganise their priorities, their teams, and their operating model. The organisations that win this decade will be the ones that can execute the change, regardless of which AI tools they chose.

"The organisations that win this decade are the ones that can execute the change."

SV Execution Partners
The gap

Every AI investment has a silent cost.

Nordic leadership teams are investing at record levels. Recent Nordic research shows 70% of firms commit 10% or more of their IT budget to AI, and 25% commit over 20%. AI is now the top investment priority across Nordic boardrooms.

The gap between that investment and measurable value is already visible. Only 33% of Nordic companies realise measurable AI benefits within two years, compared to 47% in the rest of Europe. And at the top of the distribution, only 4% see meaningful ROI on the AI spend.

Nordic firms are pouring record sums into AI. Only 4% see meaningful ROI. The gap between spend and value creation is widening every quarter. Nordic AI Inflection research, 2026

The result is a pattern that leadership teams recognise the moment it is named. AI tools are running across every function, the OKRs were written before AI arrived, no one owns the AI-linked Key Results, and each function measures adoption while business outcomes stay invisible in the weekly view. Cross-functional AI conflicts escalate to the CEO when they should resolve in 48 hours through a defined process. When the board asks what the AI investment produced this quarter, the answer comes in narrative form. The numbers are not there.

What this costs you this quarter

Every week without the execution system in place is a week where AI accelerates the wrong outputs, teams optimise for their own functions, and the distance between investment and results widens. By the time the board meeting arrives, the AI investment becomes an item on the next strategy review, with no answer to the question of what it produced.

The gap between the companies that implemented the system early and the ones that did not is widening every quarter. The window to close it is measured in the quarters remaining before the board asks the direct question about AI ROI.

Six leadership teams will implement the system with us in May 2026.

Reserve your seat
6 seats available · May 2026 cohort
The sprint

Two weeks to put the execution layer in motion.

The AI Execution Sprint is a focused, hands-on programme designed for leadership teams that already know AI matters and need the operating model around it. In two weeks, the goal is to implement the foundation of an execution system and set the weekly rhythm in motion. Rebuilding the entire organisation stays out of scope. Your leadership team leaves with a working structure to continue evolving quarter after quarter.

For companies that need a full, multi-quarter transformation, we offer a separate 12-week Execution Shift programme. The Sprint is the starting point: the layer that gets execution moving.

What we implement together

  1. One Company Objective linked to the AI transition A single objective the leadership team commits to and the whole company understands, replacing three or five competing priorities with one.
  2. Function-specific Key Results tied to business outcomes Metrics the board understands and that move weekly, such as revenue, margin, cost, speed, and risk. Adoption metrics stay out of the top view.
  3. A named ownership map One person accountable per Key Result, without shared accountability, ambiguity, or default escalation to the CEO.
  4. Decision rights across functions When Marketing and Product need the same AI resource, the decision resolves in 48 hours through a defined process, without a meeting with the CEO.
  5. A weekly leadership cadence A 15 to 20 minute rhythm that forces progress, surfaces blockers, and keeps the execution moving between quarterly reviews.
  6. A validation milestone system Weekly checkpoints that confirm real progress on a binary basis: either it moved this week or it did not.

By the end of week two, your leadership team has the foundation in place: a shared company objective, function-level Key Results with named owners, and a weekly rhythm starting to run. The system is still maturing, and it is set in motion. Your team continues to refine it quarter after quarter, with every new cycle tightening ownership, sharpening Key Results, and compounding execution across functions.

How it works

Two weeks, designed and implemented with your team in the room.

Week 1 · Diagnostic and design
Day 1
Execution diagnostic session with the leadership team. We map where AI is being adopted, what is producing outcomes, what is reporting theatre, and where the governance gap is.
Day 2–3
We design the Company Objective and Key Results architecture with the CEO and functional leads, anchored directly to the AI transition.
Day 4–5
Ownership map and decision rights defined. Cross-functional dependencies surfaced, negotiated, and resolved.
Week 2 · Implementation and rhythm
Day 6–7
Weekly cadence designed and implemented with the leadership team. First working meeting runs with us in the room, calibrating the format to your leadership dynamics.
Day 8–9
Validation milestones defined per Key Result. Dashboard structure set up. First weekly progress review.
Day 10
Final working session. Leadership team runs its first weekly cycle without us in the room. We leave with the structure in place and a team that knows how to continue refining it in the quarters that follow.
Our role is implementation. In two weeks we put the execution layer in motion and stay in the room until your team can run the first cycles. The depth of the system compounds in the quarters that follow.
Who this is for

For leadership teams that already know AI matters.

This programme is built for Nordic B2B companies with 50 to 1,000 people where AI adoption is happening, strategy exists, and the execution system has not caught up.

  • CEOs and Managing Directors At mid-market B2B companies (50–500 people) who have already declared an AI agenda and need the execution layer that turns it into board-level results.
  • COOs At companies where AI adoption is happening across functions, with nobody owning the connection between adoption and weekly outcomes.
  • VP Operations and Heads of Operations In organisations where operational excellence depends on cross-functional clarity, and where AI has added new dependencies the current governance was not built for.
  • Chiefs of Staff and Heads of Strategy Implementing a new CEO's vision or navigating a transformation programme, who need a system that aligns the full leadership team around one company objective.
  • CHROs and VP People Whose AI initiatives stagnate in leadership meetings because HR is still treated as a reporting function with no measurable weekly outcomes.
  • Enterprise leaders (500–1,000+ people) In Nordic companies where governance gaps mean cross-functional AI decisions take three people to agree and none of them report to each other.

This sprint is especially relevant if

  • Your AI tools are live, and your OKRs are not yet linked to AI outcomes.
  • Different functions are moving at different speeds with no shared rhythm.
  • Leadership meetings are full of updates and weak on decisions.
  • The CEO is still the default operating system of the business.
  • A board meeting in the next 90 days will ask for AI ROI, and the answer is unclear.
Why OKRs

OKRs are the language AI execution needs.

In a post-AI world, the volume of activity every function produces has multiplied overnight. Without a shared execution language, that volume becomes noise. Everyone is busy, the company objective stays in a slide, and every function optimises for its own interpretation of priority.

OKRs are the system that forces alignment: one Company Objective, two or three Key Results per function that move every week, named owners for each, and a weekly cadence where decisions are actually made. OKRs have been the operating model mature companies use to connect strategy to execution for two decades. In a post-AI world, that mechanism becomes essential, because the cost of not having it has become measurable.

Global research shows that 70 to 75% of OKR implementations fail within the first year. Only 23% of organisations achieve consistent OKR success across two consecutive cycles. The cause behind these failures is consistently the same across multiple studies: the absence of an execution partner who implements the system until the team can run it alone.

OKR implementation without an execution system behind it is a new vocabulary for the same misalignment.

This is the core of the sprint: implementing OKRs as the operating system that makes AI produce measurable results, embedded inside your leadership team's weekly rhythm.

Calibrated for your reality

This sprint is built for how your leadership team actually decides.

You reward clarity, proof, and low-drama professionalism. You are less responsive to hype and more responsive to a credible process, transparent thinking, and a partner who respects how decisions are actually made.

That is exactly how this sprint is built.

Consensus decisions are faster when the structure is right.

Your leadership team probably includes 5 to 7 stakeholders: CEO, COO, CHRO, CFO, VP Strategy, Heads of Business Unit. Execution systems designed without that reality collapse within weeks. The ownership map, decision rights, and weekly cadence are designed around how your team actually operates.

Evidence over promises.

Every decision is anchored in your data, your business, and your constraints. The work avoids inflated claims, vague transformation language, and "AI revolution" framing, focusing only on the system that closes the gap between AI investment and measurable outcomes.

Long-term seriousness.

The sprint is two weeks because two weeks is enough to implement the system when the work is done with precision. After that, we stay available as the rhythm compounds quarter over quarter. Zensai still runs the system we implemented with them in 2022.

About SV

Operators embedded inside leadership teams.

SV Execution Partners works with leadership teams at Nordic and European companies such as Leapwork, Zensai, Webtec, 24slides and ForceManager, and with enterprise groups like Bayer. The work is done directly with the people who run the business. Execution discipline lives inside the weekly and monthly rhythm, as the core deliverable.

20
Years OKR experience
50+
Enterprise & mid-market engagements
5
Countries, active in Nordic markets

Leadership teams we have worked with

Mike helped us set the strategic direction from 2022 to 2026. He was instrumental in helping the leadership team understand what was a priority now versus later. Even after the project, he stays in touch and continues to help.

Rasmus Holst, CEO · Zensai

A deeply transformative experience. The entire organisation changed structure, direction, and focus. Mike's feedback is precise and exacting, balanced with steadfast support and emotional intelligence.

John Than, CEO · Appficiency

SV built both the OKR structure and ran the cadences until the leadership team was ready to take over. The key outcome: the team owns the system now.

Christian Brink Frederiksen, CEO · Leapwork

SV provided strategic guidance and thoughtful feedback that helped leaders sharpen decision-making, enhance team dynamics, and drive accountability through OKRs.

Patrick Schädler, VP Customer Success · Frontify

How we are different

Typical consultants SV Execution Partners
Deliver workshops and templatesImplement the system inside your team
Hand off after the final presentationStay embedded week by week
Create dependency on external adviceBuild autonomous execution
Theory and frameworksOKRs, weekly rhythms, accountability
Continuing engagement requiredYour team runs the system alone
Pricing

One programme. Transparent from day one.

AI Execution Sprint
€2,500 / 2 weeks
Only 6 seats available for May 2026. Seats are allocated first-come, first-served.
What is included
  • Execution diagnostic of your current AI adoption
  • Company Objective design linked to AI transition
  • 2 to 3 Key Results per function with named owners
  • Decision rights and governance map
  • Weekly cadence implemented with leadership team
  • Validation milestone structure and dashboard outline
  • Direct work with leadership team (no workshops, no slides)
  • Full documentation you keep and own
What is not included
  • Full multi-quarter transformation (see Execution Shift, 12 weeks)
  • Stabilisation of the system beyond the first cycles
  • Ongoing retainer or long-term coaching
  • No upsell unless you explicitly request one
FAQ

Common questions.

Is this a strategy consultation?
No. It is a working programme focused on execution design, ownership, and cadence. You leave with a working structure your team can run the following Monday.
We already have AI initiatives running. Does this start from zero?
No. The sprint is designed to connect what already exists, your AI tools, adoption, and internal initiatives, to measurable outcomes. The existing work stays in place, with the execution layer implemented around it.
Does this replace our current OKR system or strategy framework?
No. It implements the execution layer that most mid-market systems are missing. If you already use Scaling Up, EOS, or a custom framework, we work with it. The sprint is platform-agnostic.
Is this only for large companies?
No. The sprint is calibrated for mid-market (50–500 people) and enterprise (500–1,000+ people). The complexity of cross-functional AI adoption matters more than headcount.
How many of our leadership team need to be involved?
It depends on your company and situation. Typically the CEO, COO or VP Operations, and the function leads most affected by AI. We calibrate the group and the time commitment after an initial conversation so the sprint fits the reality of your leadership team.
How is the sprint delivered?
Primarily online, through working sessions with your leadership team. We design each sprint around how your team operates and where you are based. On-site sessions can be arranged when it adds clear value to the work.
What does success look like after the sprint?
Every implementation is different. The goal is always the same: your leadership team operates a live execution system, AI-linked Key Results have named owners, and decisions that used to wait for the CEO now resolve in the weekly rhythm. How that shows up in your metrics depends on where you start.
Is this GDPR compliant?
Yes. All data handling follows EU GDPR. No company data leaves your control. We sign NDAs as standard before any engagement begins.
6 seats · May 2026 cohort

The window is short, even if the system you implement lasts.

Six leadership teams will implement the AI Execution Sprint with us in May 2026. If your company is already investing in AI and needs the operating model around it, request your seat below. A member of our team will get back to you within one business day.